From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Xen 4.0.1-rc4 and stable 2.6.32.x pvops won't start xend Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:05:22 -0700 Message-ID: <4C45E562.9070203@goop.org> References: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F0755F151003D@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com> <20100720090517.GP17817@reaktio.net> <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F0755F1510373@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com> <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F0755F15103AF@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F0755F15103AF@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Rose, Gregory V" Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/20/2010 09:10 AM, Rose, Gregory V wrote: > OK, I was working off of a special branch created by Jeremy to test the SR-IOV patches that allow for setting the VF MAC and VLAN from the host VMM using RTNETLINK messages and netdev ops. That branch doesn't include the gntdev.c device. When I switched back to the xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch it was back again. My confusion I guess, I was under the impression Jeremy's sr-iov branch was based on the stable-2.6.32.x branch that I had originally posted my patches against. Evidently they're not. > No, I rebased it to plain kernel.org v2.6.32, since there were no other Xen dependencies in your changes. J