From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756547Ab0GUMFd (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:05:33 -0400 Received: from bipbip.grupopie.com ([195.23.16.24]:39994 "EHLO bipbip.grupopie.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753288Ab0GUMFc (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:05:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4C46E289.6010009@grupopie.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:05:29 +0100 From: Paulo Marques Organization: Grupo PIE User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Justin P. Mattock" CC: trivial@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17]Documentation/blockdev/paride.txt update web address. References: <1279687926-29360-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> <1279687926-29360-2-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1279687926-29360-2-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Justin P. Mattock wrote: > The patch below removes a web address due to me being unable > to locate this at all. If anybody knows the location let > me know and I'll resend. > > Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock > > --- > Documentation/blockdev/paride.txt | 5 ----- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/blockdev/paride.txt b/Documentation/blockdev/paride.txt > index e431267..11c4e3f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/blockdev/paride.txt > +++ b/Documentation/blockdev/paride.txt > @@ -409,9 +409,4 @@ the list manager is a robot that will subscribe you using the reply > address in your mail headers. REMOVE any anti-spam gimmicks you may > have in your mail headers, when sending mail to the list server. > > -You might also find some useful information on the linux-parport > -web pages (although they are not always up to date) at > - > - http://www.torque.net/parport/ > - I don't think removing an address like this is the best option. At least having the "old" address allows me to go to www.archive.org and find out a lot of useful information. Maybe just marking it as "(dead link)" and warning the respective maintainer would be better? -- Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com "I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure."