From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Lost in iptables code. Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:02:56 -0700 Message-ID: <4C4887D0.3050309@candelatech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: NetDev Return-path: Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:60718 "EHLO ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752566Ab0GVSC5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:02:57 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.195] (firewall.candelatech.com [70.89.124.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns3.lanforge.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o6MI2ubE015659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:02:56 -0700 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I'm trying to debug an appearant bug in the "CT zones" logic in 2.6.34, and I'm having a hard time figuring out where the code enters the iptables logic. (In case it matters, the CT Zones logic is related to the 'raw' table.) I assume it would be somewhere in netif_receive_skb, but I don't see anything obvious. If anyone has suggestions where to start poking at this, please let me know. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com