From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: pvfb: Absolute vs relative mouse tracking mystery Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:13:43 -0700 Message-ID: <4C489867.1030301@goop.org> References: <4BE49501.6000408@goop.org> <4BE86945.9050408@goop.org> <20100619154145.GM17817@reaktio.net> <4C1CE6DE.8000602@goop.org> <20100619162213.GO17817@reaktio.net> <4C1D00FA.2060907@goop.org> <20100619175040.GQ17817@reaktio.net> <4C479868.1030806@goop.org> <20100722085238.GP17817@reaktio.net> <05C8BE12-9F8C-4B4B-85E3-9563ACD21805@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <05C8BE12-9F8C-4B4B-85E3-9563ACD21805@oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: John Haxby Cc: Anthony PERARD , Xen-devel , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/22/2010 12:04 PM, John Haxby wrote: > CentOS 5.5 (and RHEL5.5) deliberately turns off request-abs-pointer in > favour of relative pointers. > > The excuse given is that the RHEL5 X server isn't up to the job of > dealing with absolute pointers. The claim is that you get better > responsiveness with relative pointers and a gtk-vnc-based viewers. Er, what? How do they get it to work properly then? Is there any way to make it use abs? J