From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: "Kanigeri, Hari" <h-kanigeri2@ti.com>
Cc: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Linux Omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, "Que, Simon" <sque@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] omap:hwspinlock support-omap4
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:04:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4B0119.5020701@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8F7AF80515AF0D4D93307E594F3CB40E4D00F3A7@dlee03.ent.ti.com>
Hi Santosh,
On 7/20/2010 4:12 PM, Kanigeri, Hari wrote:
> Santosh,
>
>
>>>
>>> Hari Kanigeri (1):
>>> omap:hwspinlocks-ensure the order of registration
>>>
>>> Simon Que (4):
>>> omap:hwmod-hwspinlock-enable
>>> omap:hwspinlock-define HWSPINLOCK base address
>> I think you should fold patch 1/5 , 2/5 into patch 3/5.
>> At least patch 2/5 o.w git-bisect will break
>
> Can you please explain why this would break ?
Yep, I'm confused as well...
In fact 3 & 4 should be merged. In patch 3 we introduce 2 news files
that will not be compiled until the next patch. We'd better modify the
makefile in the same patch. For the build point of view, the patch 3
will be a noop.
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-24 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-19 16:50 [PATCH 0/5] omap:hwspinlock support-omap4 Hari Kanigeri
2010-07-19 16:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] omap:hwmod-hwspinlock-enable Hari Kanigeri
2010-07-27 15:57 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-07-27 16:05 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-07-19 16:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] omap:hwspinlock-define HWSPINLOCK base address Hari Kanigeri
2010-07-27 15:59 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-07-27 16:50 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-07-28 14:11 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-07-28 14:22 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-07-28 14:33 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-07-28 14:55 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-07-19 16:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] omap:hwspinlock-added hwspinlock driver Hari Kanigeri
2010-07-24 16:43 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-07-26 20:39 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-07-28 16:58 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-07-29 4:56 ` Marathe, Yogesh
2010-07-29 13:14 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-07-29 13:23 ` Cousson, Benoit
2010-07-30 6:53 ` Marathe, Yogesh
2010-08-02 1:55 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-07-29 13:29 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-07-29 14:05 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-08-11 22:03 ` Que, Simon
2010-08-12 2:02 ` linux hardware spinlock framework for heterogeneous processor SOCs? Nishanth Menon
2010-07-19 16:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] omap:hwspinlock-add build support Hari Kanigeri
2010-07-19 16:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] omap:hwspinlocks-ensure the order of registration Hari Kanigeri
2010-07-28 17:00 ` Premi, Sanjeev
2010-07-28 17:05 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-07-20 5:37 ` [PATCH 0/5] omap:hwspinlock support-omap4 Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-07-20 14:12 ` Kanigeri, Hari
2010-07-24 15:04 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2010-07-24 15:35 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-07-24 15:47 ` Cousson, Benoit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C4B0119.5020701@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=h-kanigeri2@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=sque@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.