From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: xenfs: implement O_NONBLOCK for /proc/xen/xenbus Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:33:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4C4D5656.7050100@redhat.com> References: <4C262665.1080404@goop.org> <4C2854FD.1050109@redhat.com> <4C2DCD76.8070101@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C2DCD76.8070101@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/02/2010 01:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 06/28/2010 09:53 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 06/26/2010 06:10 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >>> On 06/24/2010 05:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> Trivial patch. Tested only in the pvops version. >>> >>> What user do you have for this? >> >> It was reported by internal QE without many details, likely it was found >> by code inspection or some automated tool. I didn't ask because the >> patch was easy enough, but I can get more information if you care. > > It was found by a test (proc01) in LTP to read every entry of the procfs. ping? It's not in linux-2.6.18.hg either. Paolo