From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from eu1sys200aog117.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.143]:53857 "EHLO eu1sys200aog117.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750779Ab0G0E1J (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:27:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4C4E5B1E.4040004@st.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:35:50 +0530 From: Viresh KUMAR MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wim Van Sebroeck Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , armando.visconti@st.com, shiraz.hashim@st.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] Watchdog: Adding support for ARM Primecell SP805 Watchdog References: <1275465783-14052-1-git-send-email-viresh.kumar@st.com> <4C11B711.70907@st.com> <20100611053049.GM3788@infomag.iguana.be> <4C285A72.7030303@st.com> <20100628162430.GN3788@infomag.iguana.be> <20100718193425.GD24707@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100726184601.GS11857@infomag.iguana.be> In-Reply-To: <20100726184601.GS11857@infomag.iguana.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-watchdog-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org On 7/27/2010 12:16 AM, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi All, > >>>> > > > Have you reviewed this patch or still need to look at it? >>> > > >>> > > I'm chasing another bug and must admit I almost forgot about this one. >>> > > So, yes, I still need to look at this one. >> > >> > Any news on this - its still sitting in the patch system since May 31st... >> > What do I do about it? > Patch looks OK. Will add it to my linux-2.6-watchdog-next tree this week. Wim, I will send V2 of this patch, which will include modification as suggested by Linus walleij. Viresh. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@st.com (Viresh KUMAR) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:35:50 +0530 Subject: [PATCH resend] Watchdog: Adding support for ARM Primecell SP805 Watchdog In-Reply-To: <20100726184601.GS11857@infomag.iguana.be> References: <1275465783-14052-1-git-send-email-viresh.kumar@st.com> <4C11B711.70907@st.com> <20100611053049.GM3788@infomag.iguana.be> <4C285A72.7030303@st.com> <20100628162430.GN3788@infomag.iguana.be> <20100718193425.GD24707@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100726184601.GS11857@infomag.iguana.be> Message-ID: <4C4E5B1E.4040004@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 7/27/2010 12:16 AM, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi All, > >>>> > > > Have you reviewed this patch or still need to look at it? >>> > > >>> > > I'm chasing another bug and must admit I almost forgot about this one. >>> > > So, yes, I still need to look at this one. >> > >> > Any news on this - its still sitting in the patch system since May 31st... >> > What do I do about it? > Patch looks OK. Will add it to my linux-2.6-watchdog-next tree this week. Wim, I will send V2 of this patch, which will include modification as suggested by Linus walleij. Viresh.