From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Cousson, Benoit" Subject: Re: [PATCH:v4 00/13] OMAP: GPIO: Implement GPIO in HWMOD way Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:47:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4C4EC741.5040202@ti.com> References: <1277218916-15213-1-git-send-email-charu@ti.com> <20100706131741.GR3192@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:47843 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752040Ab0G0LrW (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:47:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100706131741.GR3192@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: "Varadarajan, Charulatha" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "khilman@deeprootsystems.com" , "paul@pwsan.com" , "Nayak, Rajendra" , "Basak, Partha" Hi Tony On 7/6/2010 3:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Charulatha V [100622 17:55]: >> This patch series makes OMAP2PLUS specific GPIO implemented in HWMOD >> FW way. This is done by implementing GPIO module in platform device model. >> >> This patch series is generated on "origin/pm-wip/hwmods-omap4". > > Do we still have a dependency on this series to pm-wip? Yep, I think we still need the runtime PM support and the OMAP4 hwmod data that are located only in pm-wip for the moment. Regards, Benoit > Can you please try to rebase this on top of linux-omap for-next > branch? > > Let's see if we can merge this into linux-omap master > branch for some testing before we merge it. > > Regards, > > Tony