From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Henningsson Subject: hda-compiler, was: hda-verb, hda-analyzer, hda-emu and codecgraph Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:33:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4C4EFC4C.40707@canonical.com> References: <4C4EC384.4040904@canonical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from adelie.canonical.com (adelie.canonical.com [91.189.90.139]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF00245E2 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:33:35 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: Takashi Iwai , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org 2010-07-27 16:57, Jaroslav Kysela skrev: > A little off topic: hda-compiler . I'm playing with an idea to have the > hda-intel driver behaviour description (patches) in a firmware file. There seem to be more than one thought in that area. Recently there has been some discussion (at least on Ubuntu Developer Summit) whether the device-tree[1] structure could be used in this area as well. Since we would then have separate device-tree files, we could update them independent of the kernel. I'll go to plumbers in November, could this be something to discuss at that conference? [1] http://www.devicetree.org -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic