From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 27 (xen) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:38:27 -0700 Message-ID: <4C4F27A3.5040109@oracle.com> References: <20100727160708.722c39c1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:25192 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753360Ab0G0Sir (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:38:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100727160708.722c39c1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , jeremy@goop.org, Jeremy Fitzhardinge Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20100726: > > > The xen tree lost its build problems but gained a conflict against Linus' > tree. when X86_32=y, SMP=n, X86_LOCAL_APIC=n: drivers/built-in.o: In function `xen_callback_vector': (.text+0x41238): undefined reference to `first_system_vector' alloc_intr_gate() calls alloc_system_vector(), which uses first_system_vector.