From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gandharva.secretlabs.de ([78.46.147.237]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oe96Y-0003Gt-1p for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:03:49 +0200 Received: from [192.168.2.139] (dsl-62-220-14-162.berlikomm.net [62.220.14.162]) by gandharva.secretlabs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 291D31B10C09 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C5054C7.4080602@freyther.de> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:03:19 +0800 From: Holger Freyther User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4C504C00.8080207@tycoelectronics.com> In-Reply-To: <4C504C00.8080207@tycoelectronics.com> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.46.147.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: holger+oe@freyther.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Qt4 recipe fix; fixes configure so compiler is detected properly, and QXMLPatterns gets built X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:03:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/28/2010 11:25 PM, Jay Snyder wrote: > Please see this link for two files, a patch for the recipe, and also a new file: > > http://home.comcast.net/~jay.snyder/Qt4-recipe-compiler-fix/Qt4-recipe-compiler-fix.patch this patch removes the patch you want to add. Is that correct? Could you add the "More Info" to the top of the patch as well? Could you also include the failure you are seeing? thanks