From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs-iOnpLzIbIdM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
Linux Netdev List
<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: can: expected receive behavior broken
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:36:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C514BAE.4070201@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007281023.25039.matthias.fuchs-iOnpLzIbIdM@public.gmane.org>
On 28.07.2010 10:23, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> plx_pci/sja1000 + esd_usb2
>
Hi Matthias,
i added a test program to the SVN that checks whether the CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK and
CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS socket options work properly (in can.ko and can-raw-ko
and vcan.ko).
So far i was only able to test it on vcan0, as i'm on a business trip and
don't have a real CAN hardware with me.
I'll enhance it to force the CAN netdev to be given on the commandline.
Regarding your request, i was able to see the bad behaviour in the latest
net-next-2.6. You need to make
modprobe vcan echo=1
before creating vcan devices to test the loopback on driver level!
Invoking tst-rcv-own-msgs produces this output, which is far away from the
correct (wanted) output seen in the commit message below.
sockopt default
s : 0
t : 0
timeout
sockopt - -
timeout
sockopt - R
timeout
sockopt L -
s : 3
t : 3
timeout
sockopt L R
s : 4
t : 4
timeout
done.
I'll check that with the latest linux-2.6 (after rebooting :-)
Thanks for the hint! I'll run the tst-rcv-own-msgs test tool on the upcoming
net-next-2.6's and also put it into LTP later on.
Regards,
Oliver
--- snip! ---
Added:
trunk/test/tst-rcv-own-msgs.c
Modified:
trunk/test/Makefile
Log:
Added test programm to check the correct functionality of
CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK and CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS socket options.
It needs a vcan0 virtual CAN network interface and should produce an output
like this, when invoked:
sockopt default
t : 0
timeout
sockopt - -
timeout
sockopt - R
timeout
sockopt L -
t : 3
timeout
sockopt L R
s : 4
t : 4
timeout
done.
>
> On Wednesday 28 July 2010 10:17, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> On 07/28/2010 09:56 AM, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just noticed that the receive behavior of CAN sockets is broken
>>> in current net-next-2.6.
>>> I wrote some simple code that receives messages and echos them back to
>>> the bus. When I now trigger one single message on the bus, I get
>>> this message received and echoed back in an endless loop.
>>>
>>> I do not touch the sockopts CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK or CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS in my code.
>>> Only (!) setting CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK to 0 helps at the moment. But this behavior
>>> actually has nothing to do with LOOPBACK but more with RECV_OWN_MSGS.
>>
>> Sounds wired! What driver are you using?
>>
>> Wolfgang.
>>
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-29 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-28 7:56 can: expected receive behavior broken Matthias Fuchs
[not found] ` <201007280956.38957.matthias.fuchs-iOnpLzIbIdM@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-28 8:17 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
[not found] ` <4C4FE7AC.4010806-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-28 8:23 ` Matthias Fuchs
[not found] ` <201007281023.25039.matthias.fuchs-iOnpLzIbIdM@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-29 9:36 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
[not found] ` <4C514BAE.4070201-fJ+pQTUTwRTk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-07-29 11:16 ` Oliver Hartkopp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C514BAE.4070201@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan-fj+pqtutwrtk1umjsbkqmq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=matthias.fuchs-iOnpLzIbIdM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.