From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: MMU: move bits lost judgement into a separate function
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:14:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C567E4C.9030406@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C4E536E.7030109@cn.fujitsu.com>
Introduce spte_has_volatile_bits() function to judge whether spte
bits will miss, it's more readable and can help us to cleanup code
later
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index f7b379a..e18834c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -303,6 +303,20 @@ static u64 __xchg_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
#endif
}
+static bool spte_has_volatile_bits(u64 spte)
+{
+ if (!shadow_accessed_mask)
+ return false;
+
+ if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte))
+ return false;
+
+ if (spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static void update_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
{
u64 old_spte;
@@ -683,14 +697,14 @@ static void set_spte_track_bits(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
pfn_t pfn;
u64 old_spte = *sptep;
- if (!shadow_accessed_mask || !is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte) ||
- old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask) {
+ if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
__set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
- } else
+ else
old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, new_spte);
if (!is_rmap_spte(old_spte))
return;
+
pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
if (!shadow_accessed_mask || old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
--
1.6.1.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-02 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-27 3:31 [PATCH 1/3] KVM: MMU: using kvm_set_pfn_accessed() instead of mark_page_accessed() Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-27 3:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: MMU: move bits lost judgement into a separate function Xiao Guangrong
2010-07-27 3:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: MMU: mark page dirty only when page is really written Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-02 7:50 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-02 7:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-02 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 " Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-02 7:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: MMU: move bits lost judgement into a separate function Avi Kivity
2010-08-02 7:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-02 8:14 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-08-02 8:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: MMU: using kvm_set_pfn_accessed() instead of mark_page_accessed() Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-02 9:53 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C567E4C.9030406@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.