From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suresh Jayaraman Subject: Re: 2.6.36 merge plans Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:25:06 +0530 Message-ID: <4C57A12A.1030404@suse.de> References: <20100630141755.4ac97143@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <4C2CDD02.2090403@suse.de> <20100701195247.71c3f572@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20100802134654.3ac129e7@tlielax.poochiereds.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Layton , Shirish Pargaonkar , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Steve French Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: On 08/03/2010 03:44 AM, Steve French wrote: > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: >> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:19:29 -0500 >> Steve French wrote: > > I had no problem with the last patch in your tree, but wanted > to test the one before it (the creation time patch) before merging, > and thought it would be easier to merge them in order since > they hit at least one file in common. > > Backing out the one patch I wanted to test more with Samba (the > creation time one) > I made a big merge request today to clear the 27 patches queued up already, > and expect to merge your last two and Dave's DNS one and probably > Shirish's (if they can be tested/reviewed more) this week. > Steve, are you considering the following patches as well..? cifs: show features compiled in as part of DebugData cifs: update README (I think there are no outstanding issues left unaddressed). Thanks, -- Suresh Jayaraman