From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 7/8] ACPI / PCI: Do not preserve _OSC control bits returned by a query (v2)
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 12:38:55 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5A324F.8060206@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201008041415.23248.rjw@sisk.pl>
(2010/08/04 21:15), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 04, 2010, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
>> (2010/08/04 17:43), Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
>>> /**
>>> * acpi_pci_osc_control_set - commit requested control to Firmware
>>> * @handle: acpi_handle for the target ACPI object
>>> @@ -411,14 +379,17 @@ acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_query(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask)
>>> *
>>> * Attempt to take control from Firmware on requested control bits.
>>> **/
>>
>> Updating description of this function would be appreciated.
OK, I will do it.
>>> @@ -452,7 +427,10 @@ acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 flags)
>>> capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_TYPE] = root->osc_control_set | control_req;
>>> status = acpi_pci_run_osc(handle, capbuf,&result);
>>> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
>>> - root->osc_control_set = result;
>>> + root->osc_control_set = *flags = result;
>>
>> I don't think we need to update *flags here, though it depends on the design
>> of this function interface.
>> IMHO, updating *flags only when AE_SUPPORT is returned is easy to understand.
>
> I think the patch is correct. We should update *flags in any case so that the
> caller can check what's the full mask of granted controls even if it asked for
> fewer control bits.
My idea (that will be what I'll add to the description of function) is:
On success, OS takes all of requested control(s) and *flags is updated with
set of controls now OS have.
If AE_SUPPORT returns, none of control settings are changed since Firmware
rejects granting some of requested controls. *flags is updated with set of
controls with rejected bits cleared.
All other cases mean failure, none of control settings are changed, and
*flags is unchanged.
Thanks,
H.Seto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-05 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-02 21:51 [PATCH 0/8] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] ACPI / PCI: Introduce acpi_pci_osc_control_query() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 4:52 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-03 9:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 9:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 4:52 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-03 5:04 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-03 9:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 9:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 20:58 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 4:28 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-04 23:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 23:37 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-05 23:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-05 23:46 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 4:28 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-03 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 5:04 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-02 21:54 ` [PATCH 2/8] PCI / PCIe/ AER: Introduce pci_aer_available() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 0:46 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-03 0:46 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-03 9:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 20:59 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 9:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 9:41 ` Jike Song
2010-08-03 9:41 ` Jike Song
2010-08-03 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:55 ` [PATCH 3/8] PCI / PCIe: Introduce commad line switch for disabling port services Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:56 ` [PATCH 4/8] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v6) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 1:14 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-03 1:14 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-03 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06 1:33 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-06 10:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06 1:33 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-02 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] PCI / PCIe: Disable PCIe port services during port initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] PCI / PCIe: Remove the port driver module exit routine Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 21:59 ` [PATCH 7/8] ACPI / PCI: Do not preserve _OSC control bits returned by a query (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 4:52 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-03 4:52 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-03 7:13 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-03 9:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 21:02 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 5:46 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-04 5:46 ` [linux-pm] " Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-04 8:41 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-04 9:23 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-04 9:23 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-04 10:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 10:29 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 23:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-05 3:40 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-05 3:40 ` [linux-pm] " Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-05 14:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-05 14:25 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06 1:28 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-06 1:28 ` [linux-pm] " Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-04 23:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 8:41 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-04 8:43 ` [linux-pm] " Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-04 9:39 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-04 9:39 ` [linux-pm] " Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-04 12:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-05 3:38 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-05 3:38 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2010-08-04 10:38 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 10:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-04 8:43 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-03 21:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 9:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 7:13 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-02 21:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 22:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] ACPI / PCI: Reorder checks in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-02 22:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-03 4:51 ` [PATCH 0/8] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v2) Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-03 4:51 ` Kenji Kaneshige
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C5A324F.8060206@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.