All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Richard Röjfors" <richard.rojfors@pelagicore.com>
To: Pawel Osciak <p.osciak@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Linux Media Mailing List' <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	'Mauro Carvalho Chehab' <mchehab@redhat.com>,
	'Douglas Schilling Landgraf' <dougsland@gmail.com>,
	'Samuel Ortiz' <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] media: Add a cached version of the contiguous video buffers
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:25:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5B1E35.7050407@pelagicore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001201cb33c0$af683290$0e3897b0$%osciak@samsung.com>

On 08/04/2010 12:34 PM, Pawel Osciak wrote:
>> Richard Röjfors<richard.rojfors@pelagicore.com>  wrote:
>> On 08/04/2010 11:50 AM, Pawel Osciak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How do you propose to allocate the buffers? They need to be contiguous
>>>> and using uncached memory gave really bad performance.
>>>
>>> 829440 bytes is a quite a lot and one can't reliably depend on kmalloc
>>> to be able to allocate such big chunks of contiguous memory. Were you
>>> testing this on a freshly rebooted system?
>>
>> The systems have been running for a while, but not days.
>> I don't see why would dma_alloc_coherent work better than kmalloc?
>>
>
> In principle it wouldn't. It's just it's much less intensively used and
> allocates from a special area. Not really a bullet-proof solution either
> though, I agree.

So how do we move forward? I would like to see this kind of patch go in, it
obviously makes our video driver useful.

I could change and verify the patch using dma_alloc_noncoherent instead of
kmalloc. It would have the same "limitations" as todays' uncached  buffers.

--Richard

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-05 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-03 15:18 [PATCH 1/3 v2] media: Add a cached version of the contiguous video buffers Richard Röjfors
2010-08-04  7:55 ` Pawel Osciak
2010-08-04  9:40   ` Richard Röjfors
2010-08-04  9:50     ` Pawel Osciak
2010-08-04 10:03       ` Richard Röjfors
2010-08-04 10:34         ` Pawel Osciak
2010-08-04 11:37           ` Richard Röjfors
2010-08-05 20:25           ` Richard Röjfors [this message]
2010-08-09  8:50             ` Pawel Osciak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C5B1E35.7050407@pelagicore.com \
    --to=richard.rojfors@pelagicore.com \
    --cc=dougsland@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=p.osciak@samsung.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.