All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v3)
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 12:25:24 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C5B80A4.2050503@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201008060303.51224.rjw@sisk.pl>

(2010/08/06 10:03), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is the 3rd iteration of the patchset based on
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/114917/ and the comments I received on that
> patch and the previous two iterations of this patchset.
> 
> The patches below do not make the intermediate step to put an unconditional
> _OSC query into acpi_pci_osc_control_set(), but the final result is quite
> similar to the 2nd iteration with https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/116976/
> applied on top.
> 
> [1/10] - Introduce acpi_pci_osc_control_query() allowing the caller to get a
>          mask of _OSC control bits the BIOS allows the kernel to control
>          for a given PCI root bridge.  This version repeats _OSC queries until
>          the BIOS doesn't mask any requested bits.

This contains 2 parts:
 1-A) change acpi_status acpi_pci_query_osc() to take support and *control
 1-B) introduce acpi_pci_osc_control_query()

and I'd like to kill 1-B since it is removed soon by patch [10/10].

> 
> [2/10] - Introduce pci_aer_available() allowing the caller to check if the
>          AER service driver should be enabled.
> 
> [3/10] - Introduce kernel command line switch pcie_ports=.

These 2 are prep for following big changes.

> 
> [4/10] - Rework the PCIe port driver to request _OSC control for all serives at
>          once.
> 
> [5/10] - Disable PCIe port services (that might be enabled by the BIOS) during
>          initialization.

These 2 are core part to solve the issue.

> 
> [6/10] - Remove the PCIe port driver modules exit function.

This is a cleanup. There is no reason to keep this in the series.

> 
> [7/10] - Make PCI hotplug code query _OSC before requesting control of _OSC
>          features.

Needless since removed soon by patch [10/10].

> 
> [8/10] - Rework acpi_pci_osc_control_set() so that it doesn't use cached
>         result of a query and remove the fields of struct acpi_pci_root that
>         aren't used any more.

This also contains 2 parts:
 8-A: don't use cached result
 8-B: remove query in acpi_pci_osc_control_set()

I think 8-B is not required since query relives in patch [10/10].

> 
> [9/10] - Reorder checks in acpi_pci_osc_control_set().

A minor cleanup can be out of the series.

> 
> [10/10] - Merge acpi_pci_osc_control_set() with acpi_pci_osc_control_query().

This removes many badness in this series.
I think we should have this improved acpi_pci_osc_control_set() before [4/10].

> 
> Comments welcome.

I recommend you to rearrange the order of patches in this series.

1. Misc cleanups
   [6/10]
   [9/10]
2. Prep1: prepare small parts
   [2/10]
   [3/10]
3. Prep2: improve acpi_pci_osc_control_set()
   [1-A]
   [8-A]
   [10/10]
4. Main
   [4/10]
   [5/10]

I think there is no objections to 4 patches from the first ([6,9,2,3/10]).


Thanks,
H.Seto

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-08-06  3:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-06  1:03 [PATCH 0/10] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v3) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:05 ` [PATCH 1/10] ACPI / PCI: Introduce function for querying PCI root _OSC Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:06 ` [PATCH 2/10] PCI / PCIe/ AER: Introduce pci_aer_available() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:07 ` [PATCH 3/10] PCI / PCIe: Introduce commad line switch for disabling port services Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:08 ` [PATCH 4/10] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v6) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:09 ` [PATCH 5/10] PCI / PCIe: Disable PCIe port services during port initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:10 ` [PATCH 6/10] PCI / PCIe: Remove the port driver module exit routine Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:11 ` [PATCH 7/10] PCI / Hot-plug: Query _OSC before requesting controls Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  2:20   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-06 10:34     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06 10:34     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-09  1:22       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-09  1:22       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2010-08-06  2:20   ` Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-06  1:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:12 ` [PATCH 8/10] ACPI / PCI: Do not preserve _OSC control bits returned by a query (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:13 ` [PATCH 9/10] ACPI / PCI: Reorder checks in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:15 ` [PATCH 10/10] ACPI / PCI: Merge acpi_pci_osc_control_{query|set}() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  1:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06  3:25 ` [PATCH 0/10] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v3) Hidetoshi Seto
2010-08-06  3:25 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2010-08-06 10:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-06 10:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:49 ` [PATCH 0/10] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:50   ` [PATCH 1/10] PCI / PCIe/ AER: Introduce pci_aer_available() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:50   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-24 20:49     ` Jesse Barnes
2010-08-24 20:49     ` Jesse Barnes
2010-08-20 23:51   ` [PATCH 2/10] PCI / PCIe: Introduce commad line switch for disabling port services Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:51   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:52   ` [PATCH 3/10] ACPI / PCI: Reorder checks in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:52   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:53   ` [PATCH 4/10] ACPI / PCI: Make acpi_pci_query_osc() return control bits Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:53   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:54   ` [PATCH 5/10] ACPI / PCI: Do not preserve _OSC control bits returned by a query (v4) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-23 21:55     ` [Updated changelog][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-23 21:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:54   ` [PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:55   ` [PATCH 6/10] ACPI / PCI: Negotiate _OSC control bits before requesting them Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-23 21:53     ` [Update][PATCH 6/10] ACPI / PCI: Negotiate _OSC control bits before requesting them (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-23 21:53     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:55   ` [PATCH 6/10] ACPI / PCI: Negotiate _OSC control bits before requesting them Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:56   ` [PATCH 7/10] PCI / PCIe: Ask BIOS for control of all native services at once (v7) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-21 20:02     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-21 20:02     ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:56   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:57   ` [PATCH 8/10] PCI / PCIe: Disable PCIe port services during port initialization Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:57   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:58   ` [PATCH 9/10] PCI / PCIe: Move PCIe PME code to the pcie directory Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:59   ` [PATCH 10/10] PCI / PCIe: Remove the port driver module exit routine Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-08-20 23:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-06  1:03 [PATCH 0/10] ACPI / PCI / PCIe: Rework _OSC handling (v3) Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C5B80A4.2050503@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.