From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1OiUuy-00083l-8E for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:09:40 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35841 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OiUuv-00083N-8y for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:09:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiUug-0005SH-Et for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:09:23 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:55610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OiUug-0005S3-3w for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:09:22 -0400 Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so1740006bwz.0 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:09:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=QJW/xIWotGtGdpGYgEUbo3KoqRylS506Sa5xiWNSX40=; b=fgRl+F7r6ON6i0z+SuXrYySstYZZFbFn/ONLsL3rwsisrViiY6Arag1oBRQ56qOdkj zRPA87mZeiiYiaHn3M962/LfsEYJQE11MRRsauE2lai9jcxSvkddmlVsWMVo5LnnJYC4 sXLfB3lVsgJO9JRihfAAe+gV7vCIMfkDOU+Gg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=UaFd+vM1V/zpLgk1qCtX1yYu0hlytT1QCQva84HQ0x3XEenHRDUR537u2PulbqxOjl D7U7wWPS8S66mSP48GAhw12WOi9o8VdPH9rODxh4Od7GuBifDlRMGcBJ4C9INh+d1Dgs FaYxJgjo0TPnAYu4mm+2ZA7DabAayMyVEK/Y4= Received: by 10.204.46.73 with SMTP id i9mr3237691bkf.156.1281370160673; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.bg45.phnet ([81.62.108.70]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y19sm841196bkw.18.2010.08.09.09.09.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C602826.6070406@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:09:10 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100620 Icedove/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grub-devel@gnu.org References: <4C511DF0.3080306@gmail.com> <4C558924.2040201@gmail.com> <20100809154126.GT2632@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <20100809154126.GT2632@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3C86EFE9E8D9DACEF6AC8C94" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Subject: Re: Fallback to scanning OF tree if no devaliases X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:09:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3C86EFE9E8D9DACEF6AC8C94 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/09/2010 05:41 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 04:48:04PM +0200, Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcode= r' Serbinenko wrote: > =20 >> As I already told on IRC such a behaviour isn't of a good design. A >> simple example is when one add a devalias and then all other disks >> disappear. Moreover in experimental branch I have a solution for such = a >> problem: we scan all the devices and then show only the simpliest form= =2E >> That code just needs some testing. Could you do that? I'm sorry for no= t >> having been available for last few days and this resulted in a mountai= n >> of useless work by Doug and Lennart. I assume that the rest of this >> thread is a discussion of this issue and is moot given the code which = is >> already in experimental. If it's not a case please start a new thread >> per issue >> =20 > Where do I find that? I would love to test it. > > =20 BZR checkout from http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub/branches/experimenta= l/ I'm especially interested in testing on multi-disk config (both my OFW boxes have only one disk) > I currently have the machine down because someone made a mistake that > killed the box (or so they thought). Nothing actually wrong with the > box fortunately, but it means I can spend a few hours testing things > before getting back to normal use again. > > =20 --=20 Regards Vladimir '=CF=86-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko --------------enig3C86EFE9E8D9DACEF6AC8C94 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREKAAYFAkxgKCwACgkQNak7dOguQgnxOwEAmz0O3hPsIDLQYAECgg/R9tSl N7p+a1OTCv9LSefMRnMA/1dm1SBgYKXgqsvAKcwwOgF2m8YeQ0g9VTQfwD+QQlB4 =UIua -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3C86EFE9E8D9DACEF6AC8C94--