From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 08:38:14 -0700 Message-ID: <4C62C3E6.4090606@goop.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: George Dunlap Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/11/2010 07:56 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > Going backwards to the root of the problem: The root device times out > even though the device driver successfully loads and sees the device > -- it complains about missing interrupts. It misses interrupts > because the PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi returns -16, EBUSY, and the pvops > kernel doesn't retry; so the gsi is never set up. Aside from any of the other issues, EBUSY doesn't generally suggest that the caller should try again. That would be EAGAIN. J