* Status of NFCT patch?
@ 2010-08-12 4:30 Matt Moor
2010-08-25 7:53 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matt Moor @ 2010-08-12 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lvs-devel
Hi All,
What's the merge status of the NFCT patch? We're deploying some new
boxes on 2.6.32 (the first ones for a while), and were surprised it
hadn't made it into mainline yet.
Cheers,
Matt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of NFCT patch?
2010-08-12 4:30 Status of NFCT patch? Matt Moor
@ 2010-08-25 7:53 ` Simon Horman
2010-08-25 19:48 ` Julian Anastasov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2010-08-25 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Moor; +Cc: lvs-devel, Julian Anastasov
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:30:06PM +1000, Matt Moor wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What's the merge status of the NFCT patch? We're deploying some new
> boxes on 2.6.32 (the first ones for a while), and were surprised it
> hadn't made it into mainline yet.
Julian,
do you have any particular concerns in relation to merging NFCT?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of NFCT patch?
2010-08-25 7:53 ` Simon Horman
@ 2010-08-25 19:48 ` Julian Anastasov
2010-08-26 1:32 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Julian Anastasov @ 2010-08-25 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Horman; +Cc: Matt Moor, lvs-devel
Hello,
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:30:06PM +1000, Matt Moor wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What's the merge status of the NFCT patch? We're deploying some new
> > boxes on 2.6.32 (the first ones for a while), and were surprised it
> > hadn't made it into mainline yet.
>
> Julian,
>
> do you have any particular concerns in relation to merging NFCT?
May be it is time NFCT patch to be merged. It is
even later because code from the NFCT patch went to wrong
place (ip_vs_ftp.c) when the recent changes from Hannes Eder
were applied. I prefer ip_vs_nfct.c to contain all NFCT-related
code as in my patch. May be I should resync it to more recent
tree, may be this weekend.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Status of NFCT patch?
2010-08-25 19:48 ` Julian Anastasov
@ 2010-08-26 1:32 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2010-08-26 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julian Anastasov; +Cc: Matt Moor, lvs-devel
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:48:39PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:30:06PM +1000, Matt Moor wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > What's the merge status of the NFCT patch? We're deploying some new
> > > boxes on 2.6.32 (the first ones for a while), and were surprised it
> > > hadn't made it into mainline yet.
> >
> > Julian,
> >
> > do you have any particular concerns in relation to merging NFCT?
>
> May be it is time NFCT patch to be merged. It is
> even later because code from the NFCT patch went to wrong
> place (ip_vs_ftp.c) when the recent changes from Hannes Eder
> were applied. I prefer ip_vs_nfct.c to contain all NFCT-related
> code as in my patch. May be I should resync it to more recent
> tree, may be this weekend.
Thanks, that would be great.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-26 1:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-12 4:30 Status of NFCT patch? Matt Moor
2010-08-25 7:53 ` Simon Horman
2010-08-25 19:48 ` Julian Anastasov
2010-08-26 1:32 ` Simon Horman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.