From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:56:32 +0400 Message-ID: <4C654100.3060307@vlnb.net> References: <1281616891-5691-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1281616891-5691-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1281616891-5691-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: jaxboe@fusionio.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, James.Bottomley@suse.de, tytso@mit.edu, chris.mason@oracle.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp, dm-devel@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, rwheeler@redhat.com, hare@suse.de, Christoph Hellwig , Nick Piggin , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Chris Wright List-Id: dm-devel.ids Hello Tejun, Tejun Heo, on 08/12/2010 04:41 PM wrote: > Nobody is making meaningful use of ORDERED_BY_TAG now and queue > draining for barrier requests will be removed soon which will render > the advantage of tag ordering moot. Have you seen Hannes Reinecke's and my measurements in http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=128110662528485&w=2 and http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=128111995217405&w=2 correspondingly? If yes, what else evidences do you need to see that the tag ordering is a big performance win? Vlad