From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.182]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkqLb-0002oK-Tm for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 05:26:53 +0200 Received: (qmail 1994 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 03:19:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (209.242.7.179) by smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.182) with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2010 03:19:53 -0000 Message-ID: <4C68AE52.8000709@mwester.net> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:19:46 -0500 From: Mike Westerhof User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.202.165.182 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mike@mwester.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: cleaning recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 03:26:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Dear all, > > As some of you might have noticed I've been cleaning up our > recipes.during the last week or so. ... > Anyway, if there are issues because of this action, or if you feel > removal of a recipe was not in accordance with the TSC guidelines, let > me know and I'll repair. (This is NOT how I read the TSC guidelines, but I'm tired of arguing with your obsession!) Frankly, the issue isn't if YOU put back a missing recipe, or I do it. I know how to use an SCM tool, it's about 30 seconds -- or less -- to do it. The problem, as I've mentioned before, is in finding that to be the issue, of course. What distros (and their package feeds) have you built to test your assumptions? > Have fun! Well, thank you for your wishes. But to be honest, it's more fun when I can focus on fixing REAL problems, rather than worrying about artificial ones introduced for no really useful reason -- although I understand that you vehemently and stubbornly disagree. I guess you win this point, so it's fun for you at least! > Frans -Mike (mwester)