From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hermes.mlbassoc.com ([64.234.241.98] helo=mail.chez-thomas.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkqYO-0000ey-R3 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 05:40:06 +0200 Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id A002E16607EC; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:39:30 -0600 (MDT) Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (hermes_local [192.168.1.101]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B59B16607C0; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:39:10 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4C68B2DE.6020803@mlbassoc.com> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:39:10 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.234.241.98 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gary@mlbassoc.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Cc: Koen Kooi , gumstix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: What to do about the poor bitbake Quality Control? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 03:40:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/15/2010 03:22 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 14-08-10 17:46, AJ ONeal wrote: >> This is about the 4th time that I've `rm -rf`-d everything and started from >> scratch and never yet got a working `bitbake omap3-console-image` > > That recipe isn't in OE, so it seems you're building from what we call > "some random tree", which is unsupported. Complain to the people in > charge of that tree and tell them to fix things. > > If people don't care enough to get there stuff upstream, upstream won't > care about problems in that tree. I suggest that _you_ practice what you preach. There have been tons of messages on this list complaining about recipes that you are responsible for (or at least have the last checkin on) and nothing ever seems to get done about it. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------