From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.xora.org.uk ([80.68.91.202] helo=xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Okypm-0000yv-Md for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:31:17 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070B4A5E04 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:30:13 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk Received: from xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J287tyQ-4DBj for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:30:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.1.119] (188-220-34-37.zone11.bethere.co.uk [188.220.34.37]) by xora.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2DC6A5E03 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:30:11 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C692F5F.9090208@xora.org.uk> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:30:23 +0100 From: Graeme Gregory User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 80.68.91.202 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dp@xora.org.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: cleaning recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 12:31:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 16/08/10 13:14, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/8/16 Koen Kooi : > would be nice if oe would detect those cases and force a rebuild. >> That doesn't help if you're using packagemanagement. Now you have >> "foo_1.0-r0.ipk" in the feeds that statically linked to openssl 0.9.8 >> and "foo_1.0-r0.ipk" locally that statically links to 1.0.0. So users >> still don't get the fixes that went into openssl. > Agree. > I vaguely recall an idea (I believe from RP) to have a hash or so > derived from the whole dependency tree below it. > This discussion probably ran somewhere last winter. > > Frans > A quick implementation would sum all PR in depends tree above us. Graeme