All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: adeos-main <adeos-main@gna.org>
Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] Deadlock-prone ipipe_critical_enter
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:21:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6A70D7.4040306@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C6A6FE7.6030508@domain.hid>

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> it turned out ipipe_critical_enter is broken on SMP > 2 CPUs: On one
> CPU, Linux may have acquired an rwlock for reading when being preempted
> by the critical IPI. On some other CPU, Linux may have entered
> write_lock_irq[save] before the IPI arrived. The reader will be stuck in
> __ipipe_do_critical_sync, the writer in __write_lock_failed - forever.
> First seen on real silicon (once per "few" hundreds of boots), finally
> caught under KVM and nailed down.
> 
> Two approaches to resolve this issue come to my mind so far. The first
> one is to restart the whole ipipe_critical_enter after some (how many?)
> cycles of futile waiting. The other is to accept the critical IPI even
> if the top-most domain is stalled (as it sits in write_lock_irq), but
> I'm not 100% that our optimistic IRQ mask will always allow this when
> Linux is on the top (I assume we can safely require other domains to
> avoid such deadlocks by design).
> 
> Comments? Better ideas?

I guess, the rwlocks are ipipe rwlocks, right?
I am not sure it is different from your second idea, but what about
spinning in write_lock_irq/save with irqs on?

-- 
					    Gilles.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-17 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-17 11:17 [Adeos-main] Deadlock-prone ipipe_critical_enter Jan Kiszka
2010-08-17 11:21 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix [this message]
2010-08-17 11:34   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-17 11:36     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-08-17 11:41       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-08-17 15:33 ` Philippe Gerum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C6A70D7.4040306@domain.hid \
    --to=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
    --cc=adeos-main@gna.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.