From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4C6A97EB.7000104@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:08:43 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1282047938.5255.89.camel@domain.hid> <4C6A8194.80008@domain.hid> <1282048491.5255.92.camel@domain.hid> <4C6A8332.5050308@domain.hid> <1282049663.5255.99.camel@domain.hid> <4C6A893E.9000907@domain.hid> <1282051157.5255.108.camel@domain.hid> <4C6A8E49.10204@domain.hid> <1282053444.5255.116.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1282053444.5255.116.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] xenomai 2.5.3/native, kernel 2.6.31.8 and fork() List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?S3J6eXN6dG9mIELFgmFzemtvd3NraQ==?= Cc: Xenomai core Krzysztof B=C5=82aszkowski wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 15:27 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> What are the contents of this linker script? I did not ask to compare >> gcc -print-file-name=3Dlibc.so with the same file on the target. I ask= ed >> to compare: >> gcc -print-file-name=3Dlibc.so (or if it is a linker script, the libc.= so.6 >> it references) >> with /lib/libc.so.6 >> >> In other words: the libc used by the compiler with the libc used at >> run-time, as my very first answer was asking. >> >=20 > /usr/lib/libc.so can't be compared with /lib/libc.so.6. libc.so is a linker script, so the sentence "or if it is a linker script, the libc.so.6 it references" applies. Anyway, now we got to the bottom of it, ok, libc.so references /lib/libc.so.6. But since you already made me spend one hour having you understand the difference between the compiler libc and the one of the root filesystem, I will not have be able to run your test before tonight.= In the mean-time, please run your test with Xenomai 2.5.4. --=20 Gilles.