From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC] CONFIG_RESET_PHY_R feature is broken
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:02:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6B858F.9060201@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C6B1843.3080005@emcraft.com>
Le 18/08/2010 01:16, Ilya Yanok a ?crit :
> Hello Ben, Everybody,
>
> some boards used to have their PHY quirks in board-specific reset_phy()
> function. This used to work because of reset_phy() being called later
> than Ethernet drivers initialization during startup.
> But nowadays some drivers (in particular I faced this problem using
> mpc5xxx_fec driver) use 'on demand' PHY initialization, and
> board-specific quirks don't have effect any more... Actually,
> CONFIG_RESET_PHY_R is broken even without 'on demand' PHY
> initialization: at least mpc5xxx_fec driver can decide to reinit PHY
> during normal operation and board-specific reset_phy() function won't be
> called in this case too... Another design flaw of the CONFIG_RESET_PHY_R
> feature is that boards with more than one Ethernet controller are pretty
> common today and usually we want to initialize only the PHY connected to
> the controller we are trying to use at the moment and there is no way to
> tell the reset_phy() function which PHY we want to reset...
>
> Ben, do you have any ideas how we could fix this?
>
> I believe on of possible solutions here would be to introduce generic
> PHY layer in U-Boot but unfortunately this would be too much efforts for
> us in this project... Maybe somebody is aware of such work being done so
> we can join?
>
> Regards, Ilya.
Hi Ilya,
At the moment your problem is not being able to reset the PHY at times
other than boot, i.e. the 'PHY API' would be limited to reset_phy()
which is pretty much board-specific anyway. What prevents simply adding
calls to reset_phy() to the driver? It needs them anyway, so it will
never be compiled without a reset_phy() to call, right?
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-18 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-17 23:16 [U-Boot] [RFC] CONFIG_RESET_PHY_R feature is broken Ilya Yanok
2010-08-18 7:02 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2010-08-18 7:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-18 8:47 ` Ilya Yanok
2010-08-18 10:30 ` Albert ARIBAUD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C6B858F.9060201@free.fr \
--to=albert.aribaud@free.fr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.