From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from exprod5og104.obsmtp.com ([64.18.0.178]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OleoL-0003iM-QH for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:19:56 +0200 Received: from source ([12.71.149.1]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5ob104.postini.com ([64.18.4.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTGulouwBGhbb9NCIPs/HLfvOR0hp5TxJ@postini.com; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 02:19:36 PDT Received: from unknown (HELO alpmlef06.e2k.ad.ge.com) ([3.159.18.15]) by Cinmlip08.e2k.ad.ge.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2010 04:32:45 -0400 Received: from [3.138.54.214] ([3.138.54.214]) by alpmlef06.e2k.ad.ge.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:32:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4C6B9A31.9000706@ge.com> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:30:41 +0100 From: Martyn Welch Organization: GE Intelligent Platforms User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4C68B2C5.5030908@mlbassoc.com> In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2010 08:32:44.0343 (UTC) FILETIME=[EE00F470:01CB3EAF] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.18.0.178 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martyn.welch@ge.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: What to do about the poor bitbake Quality Control? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:19:56 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:19:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 17/08/10 16:02, Cliff Brake wrote: > I think it would be very useful to have a "stable" branch that is only > synchronised with dev when X number of targets build from a clean > build. It seems like this would be high value, with little effort. > Of course there will be corner things that break, but at least a new > beagleboard user can check out something and have reasonable > confidence that it will build images. > > Does anyone have suggestions for the branch name and a reasonable > subset of machines and build targets? Perhaps someone is already > running these clean builds? At one point we had a machine at OSUOSL > dedicated to this purpose, but no one ever set it up. > So something like Debian's stable, testing and unstable[1]? Martyn [1] http://www.debian.org/releases/ -- Martyn Welch (Principal Software Engineer) | Registered in England and GE Intelligent Platforms | Wales (3828642) at 100 T +44(0)127322748 | Barbirolli Square, Manchester, E martyn.welch@ge.com | M2 3AB VAT:GB 927559189