From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4C6BEE9B.1080000@domain.hid> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:30:51 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1282047938.5255.89.camel@domain.hid> <4C6B146D.9010004@domain.hid> <1282126974.5255.262.camel@domain.hid> <4C6BBD62.3050907@domain.hid> <1282131617.5255.286.camel@domain.hid> <4C6BCB51.4010805@domain.hid> <1282133876.5255.296.camel@domain.hid> <4C6BD403.4030902@domain.hid> <1282136147.5255.306.camel@domain.hid> <4C6BE297.4060706@domain.hid> <1282140262.5255.313.camel@domain.hid> <4C6BE9D3.1080907@domain.hid> <1282141537.5255.315.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1282141537.5255.315.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] xenomai 2.5.3/native, kernel 2.6.31.8 and fork() List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?S3J6eXN6dG9mIELFgmFzemtvd3NraQ==?= Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Krzysztof B=C5=82aszkowski wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 16:10 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Krzysztof B=C5=82aszkowski wrote: >>> yes. i downloaded this config a while ago. need to setup new kernel >>> 2.6.31.1 with xenomai.=20 >>> is 2.5.4 suitable for this test ?=20 >>> should i also use adeos-*.31.1-*2.4-09 patch ? >> See the versions I posted in my test report yesterday. They were made >> with this configuration. >> >=20 > ok. kernel 2.6.31.8, 2.5.4, ht will be enabled, >=20 > for xenomai's configure i will pass following switches: > --enable-x86-sep --enable-x86-tsc --enable-smp >=20 > is this okay ? Yes. --=20 Gilles.