From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010... Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:52:10 +0400 Message-ID: <4C6C1DCA.7040103@vlnb.net> References: <594039.74663.qm@web111905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <594039.74663.qm@web111905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chetan Loke Cc: James Bottomley , scst-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Chetan Loke, on 08/18/2010 06:58 PM wrote: > 3) above is something that I emailed Vlad and the scst community > based on our offline conversation after the open panel. If SCST > really has licensing issues then I will personally stop using SCST. > Since Vlad hasn't expressed any concerns on the above and neither > have you commented on it, is it safe to assume that the licensing > requirement is a non-issue? I believe there are no licensing issues with SCST. All the patches I have submitted and going to submit licensed under GPLv2. Vlad