From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, jgarzik@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sata_sil boot failure with 2.6.35
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:22:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C6ED603.9020602@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C6EC878020000780001146D@vpn.id2.novell.com>
On 08/20/2010 12:24 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on one of my systems (the only one with that sort of controller) boot
> fails with .35 due to an identify failure for the drive that has the root
> partition (and others):
>
> libata version 3.00 loaded.
> sata_sil 0000:00:12.0: version 2.4
> sata_sil 0000:00:12.0: enabling device (0005 -> 0007)
> alloc irq_desc for 22 on node -1
> alloc kstat_irqs on node -1
> sata_sil 0000:00:12.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 22 (level, low) -> IRQ 22
> scsi0 : sata_sil
> scsi1 : sata_sil
> ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 mmio m512@0xc0000000 tf 0xc0000080 irq 22
> ata2: SATA max UDMA/100 mmio m512@0xc0000000 tf 0xc00000c0 irq 22
> input: ImExPS/2 Generic Explorer Mouse as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input1
> ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> ata1.00: NODEV after polling detection
> ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
>
> With some debugging printk-s added I found that "status" as passed
> from ata_sff_pio_task() to ata_sff_hsm_move() is 0x50 (instead of
> the expected 0x58), and I also found that adding a certain delay
> at the top of ata_sff_pio_task() for just the very first invocation
> makes the problem go away: putting udelay(400) there works,
> while udelay(300) isn't sufficient.
>
> 2.6.34.x is working fine.
>
> The controller is reported as
>
> 00:12.0 IDE interface [0101]: ATI Technologies Inc IXP SB400 Serial ATA Controller [1002:4379]
>
> Thanks for any hints towards debugging or resolving this problem.
sata_sil has been stable for a while, for most people. The only
post-2.6.34 major changes to sata_sil's operations are the SFF/BMDMA
separation changes, AFAICT.
Unfortunately, that's a very large patch series, with no easy "try to
revert <this>" point. Is there any chance you can bisect this?
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-20 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-20 16:24 sata_sil boot failure with 2.6.35 Jan Beulich
2010-08-20 19:22 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2010-08-23 10:28 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-23 12:57 ` Jan Beulich
2010-08-23 13:58 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-23 15:47 ` Jan Beulich
2010-08-24 13:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-24 15:17 ` Jan Beulich
2010-08-24 15:16 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-25 8:20 ` Jan Beulich
2010-08-30 13:39 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-30 13:42 ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-31 15:22 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C6ED603.9020602@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.