From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add cpu hotplug support for 2.6.32 branch Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:45:27 -0700 Message-ID: <4C6F21A7.6000605@goop.org> References: <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D306597328C6827D@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4C6C3752.8030700@goop.org> <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D306597329D95961@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D306597329D95961@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Jiang, Yunhong" Cc: Xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/19/2010 08:45 PM, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: > Jeremy, I think all this patch is purely for acpi changes, so not sure if it is ok to apply it on origin/xen/dom0/acpi-next? > I have a talk with Ke, the xen/dom0/acpi-next has already covere all work for PM and CPU/Mem hotplug in a cleaner way and is based on 2.6.32 kernel, so maybe we can use that for the base tree. I'm not sure what you mean by the "base tree". As far as I know, everything is already merged into the 2.6.32 tree. Have I overlooked something? Thanks, J