From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Edward Shishkin Subject: Re: [fsck.reiser4 --fix] segfaults and reports that it fixed problem (but it doesn't) Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 18:03:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4C714A5E.50201@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DbsUkPNSbcrgSSYjMW4i5RYRKgsKLdCd6acw0mRc008=; b=gKFdrVrC7ENgIvumMqxovvRzUCxPNgHcwR2VCvaRgv5Ek5ggBnF9Ki2M5gDvhad5pF VEoLkKE44FCq+qL9yO6A1Tme/d6yJDe5tQbwqakvzMffVe+RoAgCUP+vszOVxItISqfi /65EdvjcsEW868/Fn4FldC21+6hrJ99//W/Z8= In-Reply-To: Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: zic422@gmail.com Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org zic422@gmail.com wrote: > Check was perfomed from Debian Squeeze. > Even if I explicitly write -o > create=ccreg40,compress=lzo1,cluster=4K Why do you need so small clusters? Frankly, I don't know any patten, where things with 4K clusters go better... > ,compressMode=ultim the only > difference is that there is no segfault. >