From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4C723CD4.60604@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:18:12 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C7232E6.8070709@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai patch for AT91ARM9200 List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Prakash A S Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org Prakash A S wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix < > gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> wrote: > >> Prakash A S wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> Now I am working on AT91RM9200 based processor ARM board with >> Linux >>> 2.6.20 kernel and also planing to port Xenomai on this board. I preferred >>> xenomai-2.4.0. Because it has adeos-ipipe patch for 2.6.20 kernel. >> However I >>> found that there is an separate ipipe patch available for AT91 processor >> in >>> xenomai-2.3.2. Do I need any similar patch for xenomai-2.4.0 or >>> adeos-ipipe-2.6.20-arm-1.802.patch is enough?. >>> >>> I beleive the steps will be like, >>> linux-2.6.20+2.6.20-at91.patch.gz+adeos-ipipe-2.6.20-arm-1.802.patch >> You did it again: as documented in ksrc/arch/arm/patches/README, >> what Xenomai version you pick is largely irrelevant to what I-pipe patch >> you want to use, so, you can probably use the I-pipe patch for 2.6.20 >> with Xenomai 2.5.4. >> >> > Agreed. The intention is to clarify few doubts. Otherwise I will missed to > get such an specific info mentioned below. > Thanks for the info. > > >> All releases of a Xenomai branch are backward compatible, so, if you >> want to pick something in the any branch, pick the latest (2.4.10 for >> 2.4 branch, 2.5.4 for 2.5 branch). Also note that all I-pipe patches up >> to, but not including, 2.6.28-1.12-05, are buggy, so, if you want to use >> 2.6.20, you will have to apply the patch attached to this mail: >> >> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2009-08/msg00021.html >> >> As for the initial question, I do not remember that far in the past. >> But, at some point in the past, the I-pipe patch started being able to >> be applied with and without the AT91 patch, I do not remember if >> 2.6.20-1.8-02 was in this case. >> >> > At this moment my board only supports linux-2.6.20. So I just like to port > xenomai and test the board with the same kernel version. Later I will > upgrade the linux kernel and move to the latest xenomai. > > I would like to know in which format you getting my mails now?. You can check the mail contents: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a98061861f048e7a11ca --001636c5a98061861f048e7a11ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix < gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> wrote: (...) --001636c5a98061861f048e7a11ca Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Gilles = Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org> wrote:
-- Gilles.