From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:20:24 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] Non-experimental U-Boot compilation
In-Reply-To: <616105.24678.qm@web137419.mail.in.yahoo.com>
References: <920899.1081.qm@web137419.mail.in.yahoo.com>
	<4C7282FB.9020008@emk-elektronik.de>
	<616105.24678.qm@web137419.mail.in.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4C7380C8.3020901@emk-elektronik.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear sandeep suresh,
> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
> Appreciate your quick response. I had done this earlier
> before posting this mail, but with the same problem:
> step 1) export PATH=$PATH:/work/arm/4.3.2/bin
> step 2) make distclean
> step 3) make AT91SAM9260ek_config
> step 4)make
> Can you please help me further, please.

I can't help you with the following tasks:

1. find out what are the differences between 9260-EK and 9G20-EK ?

2. find out what subtle differences might exist between 9260 and 9G20 SoC?

It might be more than "AT91SAM9G20 = 400MHz version of  AT91SAM9260"...

And I can't see in above transcript where you set the #define I mentioned.

"#ifdef CONFIG_AT91SAM9G20EK" exists in various places in the source, but
I do not know if that ever was a really working port or just someone
starting on it.

Reinhard

PS: it is mandatory to post replies to the mailing list as well!