From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (slab tree related) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:57:41 +0300 Message-ID: <4C74DB05.7000101@cs.helsinki.fi> References: <20100824120714.8918f8de.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4C740450.3030000@cs.helsinki.fi> <4C741029.7090300@cs.helsinki.fi> <4C74D1D7.4080608@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:57923 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752747Ab0HYI5n (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:57:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C74D1D7.4080608@kernel.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tejun Heo Cc: Christoph Lameter , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8/25/10 11:18 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On 08/24/2010 08:53 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: >>> [ 0.000000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Cannot create slab kmem_cache >>> size=232 realsize=256 order=0 offset=0 flags=42000 >> >> alloc per cpu result in kmalloc which fails. >> >> Tejon: Is there some way we could get a reserved per cpu area under UP >> instead of fallback to slab allocations during bootup? > > Eh... nasty. Maybe we can create a alloc_percpu_early() function > which doesn't allow freeing of allocate memory and just redirect to > bootmem on UP? Yeah, I was thinking about that too. Pekka