All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/7] change headers preparing for steal time
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:04:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C76D6C2.3010608@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C76D22D.9010007@redhat.com>

On 08/26/2010 04:44 PM, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> On 08/25/2010 11:43 AM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> This guest/host common patch prepares infrastructure for
>> the steal time implementation. Some constants are added,
>> and a name change happens in pvclock vcpu structure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h | 4 +++-
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
>> index 05eba5e..1759c81 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>> * in pvclock structure. If no bits are set, all flags are ignored.
>> */
>> #define KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE_STABLE_BIT 24
>> +#define KVM_FEATURE_CLOCKSOURCE_STEAL_BIT 25
>>
>> #define MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK 0x11
>> #define MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME 0x12
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h
>> b/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h
>> index 35f2d19..417061b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h
>> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
>>
>> struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info {
>> u32 version;
>> - u32 pad0;
>> + u32 steal_time;
>> u64 tsc_timestamp;
>> u64 system_time;
>> u32 tsc_to_system_mul;
>> @@ -40,5 +40,7 @@ struct pvclock_wall_clock {
>> } __attribute__((__packed__));
>>
>> #define PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT (1<< 0)
>> +#define PVCLOCK_STEAL_BIT (2<< 0)
>> +
>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>> #endif /* _ASM_X86_PVCLOCK_ABI_H */
>
>
> Will 32 bits be enough?

Good question.   Reading the rest of the code,
I suspect it won't be, but Glauber will know
better.

-- 
All rights reversed

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-26 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-25 21:43 [RFC 0/7] KVM steal time implementation Glauber Costa
2010-08-25 21:43 ` [RFC 1/7] Implement getnsboottime kernel API Glauber Costa
2010-08-25 21:43   ` [RFC 2/7] change headers preparing for steal time Glauber Costa
2010-08-25 21:43     ` [RFC 3/7] measure time out of guest Glauber Costa
2010-08-25 21:43       ` [RFC 4/7] change kernel accounting to include steal time Glauber Costa
2010-08-25 21:43         ` [RFC 5/7] kvm steal time implementation Glauber Costa
2010-08-25 21:43           ` [RFC 6/7] touch softlockup watchdog Glauber Costa
2010-08-25 21:43             ` [RFC 7/7] tell guest about steal time feature Glauber Costa
2010-08-26 22:13           ` [RFC 5/7] kvm steal time implementation Rik van Riel
2010-08-26 22:35             ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-26 17:23         ` [RFC 4/7] change kernel accounting to include steal time Marcelo Tosatti
2010-08-26 20:28           ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-26 20:47             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-08-26 21:05               ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-26 21:13               ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-26 21:14             ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-26 21:40               ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-26 23:12                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-08-27  0:33                   ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-27 15:25                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-08-26 21:19         ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-26 21:39           ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-29  9:59         ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-29 15:13           ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-29 15:25             ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-29 15:42               ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-29 15:47                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-30 12:42           ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-30 13:15             ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-26 20:54       ` [RFC 3/7] measure time out of guest Zachary Amsden
2010-08-26 21:14         ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-29  9:53       ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-26 20:44     ` [RFC 2/7] change headers preparing for steal time Zachary Amsden
2010-08-26 21:04       ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2010-08-26 21:17         ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-26 22:11           ` Rik van Riel
2010-08-29  9:51     ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-30 12:44       ` Glauber Costa
2010-08-30 13:10         ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-26 19:46   ` [RFC 1/7] Implement getnsboottime kernel API Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C76D6C2.3010608@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=glommer@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.