From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Ladisch Subject: Re: ice1712 and the delta 1010 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:28:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4C775B1D.6090603@ladisch.de> References: <20100826065854.519ee1d3@debussy> <4C7665CC.5080302@ladisch.de> <20100826092713.3debd6c1@debussy> <4C768064.5050207@ladisch.de> <20100826122255.33e18696@debussy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A6D243FD for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 08:28:44 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20100826122255.33e18696@debussy> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: David Santamauro Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org David Santamauro wrote: > Now that I'm thinking about it, wouldn't any type of interference > register under windows as well? If Windows uses a different interrupt frequency that isn't in the audible range, the power fluctuations wouldn't be noticeable. Or it could use some different power management mechanism. > Have there been any other reports of this nature regarding 32 vs 64-bit > anomalies? You are using a different version of the distribution, so it might be as well any other configuration change. Regards, Clemens