[refpolicy] roles_dbadm.patch

[kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com (KaiGai Kohei)]

(2010/08/27 7:31), Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F14/roles_dbadm.patch
> 
> Add sudo for transition from staff.
> 
> I think this should not be a login domain.

| --- a/policy/modules/roles/dbadm.te
| +++ b/policy/modules/roles/dbadm.te
| @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ gen_tunable(dbadm_read_user_files, false)
|
|  role dbadm_r;
|
| -userdom_base_user_template(dbadm)
| +userdom_unpriv_user_template(dbadm)
|
|  ########################################
|  #

The userdom_unpriv_user_template() contains userdom_login_user_template()
which allows dbadm_t performs as a login domain.
It is not what you intend, is it?

In the latest refpolicy, dbadm is declared with userdom_base_user_template().

| @@ -58,3 +58,7 @@ optional_policy(`
|  optional_policy(`
|  	postgresql_admin(dbadm_t, dbadm_r)
|  ')
| +
| +optional_policy(`
| +	sudo_role_template(dbadm, dbadm_r, dbadm_t)
| +')
| diff --git a/policy/modules/roles/guest.te b/policy/modules/roles/guest.te
| index 531c616..321e5a7 100644

Also, it was already merged in the latest refpolicy.

BTW, could you add the dbadm.pp into selinux-policy package?
IIRC, you concerned about dbadm_t is declared as login domain.

Thanks,
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>