From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hermes.mlbassoc.com ([64.234.241.98] helo=mail.chez-thomas.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ooy4z-0006fg-8y for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:30:47 +0200 Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id 15FB3166096C; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:30:01 -0600 (MDT) Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (hermes_local [192.168.1.101]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB631660953; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:29:40 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4C77AFB4.6000809@mlbassoc.com> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:29:40 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4C77AE8B.80607@xora.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4C77AE8B.80607@xora.org.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.234.241.98 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gary@mlbassoc.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] review process X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:30:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/27/2010 06:24 AM, Graeme Gregory wrote: > On 27/08/10 13:15, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> 1. If a patch does not get any review feedback in X weeks time; it is >> ok to apply it. People who need more time to review a patch can >> mention that in a short reply. In that case they are granted Y more >> weeks to review. >> (suggestion: X = Y = 2) > I have always been a supported of apply it and see who screams. I have > suggested before that after 2 weeks without review any non core patch is > obviously OK. That said, what good does it do for those affected to scream if the originator simply ignores it?? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------