From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: MMU: improve spte audit
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:02:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C78FAC8.6050806@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C78FA00.8090606@cn.fujitsu.com>
Both audit_mappings() and audit_sptes_have_rmaps() need to walk vcpu's page table, so we can do
these checking in a spte walking
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu_debug.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_debug.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_debug.c
index 812d6dc..c4ebe6a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_debug.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_debug.c
@@ -24,23 +24,24 @@ static bool mmu_debug;
static const char *audit_msg;
-typedef void (*inspect_spte_fn) (struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep);
+typedef void (*inspect_spte_fn) (struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level);
-static void __mmu_spte_walk(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
- inspect_spte_fn fn)
+static void __mmu_spte_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+ inspect_spte_fn fn, int level)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; ++i) {
- u64 ent = sp->spt[i];
-
- if (is_shadow_present_pte(ent)) {
- if (!is_last_spte(ent, sp->role.level)) {
- struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
- child = page_header(ent & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
- __mmu_spte_walk(kvm, child, fn);
- } else
- fn(kvm, &sp->spt[i]);
+ u64 *ent = sp->spt;
+
+ fn(vcpu, ent + i, level);
+
+ if (is_shadow_present_pte(ent[i]) &&
+ !is_last_spte(ent[i], level)) {
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *child;
+
+ child = page_header(ent[i] & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
+ __mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, child, fn, level - 1);
}
}
}
@@ -52,19 +53,21 @@ static void mmu_spte_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, inspect_spte_fn fn)
if (!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu.root_hpa))
return;
+
if (vcpu->arch.mmu.shadow_root_level == PT64_ROOT_LEVEL) {
hpa_t root = vcpu->arch.mmu.root_hpa;
sp = page_header(root);
- __mmu_spte_walk(vcpu->kvm, sp, fn);
+ __mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, sp, fn, PT64_ROOT_LEVEL);
return;
}
+
for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
hpa_t root = vcpu->arch.mmu.pae_root[i];
if (root && VALID_PAGE(root)) {
root &= PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK;
sp = page_header(root);
- __mmu_spte_walk(vcpu->kvm, sp, fn);
+ __mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, sp, fn, 2);
}
}
return;
@@ -80,80 +83,56 @@ static void walk_all_active_sps(struct kvm *kvm, sp_handler fn)
fn(kvm, sp);
}
-static void audit_mappings_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 page_pte,
- gva_t va, int level)
+static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
{
- u64 *pt = __va(page_pte & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
- int i;
- gva_t va_delta = 1ul << (PAGE_SHIFT + 9 * (level - 1));
-
- for (i = 0; i < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; ++i, va += va_delta) {
- u64 *sptep = pt + i;
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
- gfn_t gfn;
- pfn_t pfn;
- hpa_t hpa;
-
- sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
-
- if (sp->unsync) {
- if (level != PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "audit: (%s) error: unsync sp: %p level = %d\n",
- audit_msg, sp, level);
- return;
- }
-
- if (*sptep == shadow_notrap_nonpresent_pte) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "audit: (%s) error: notrap spte in unsync sp: %p\n",
- audit_msg, sp);
- return;
- }
- }
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+ gfn_t gfn;
+ pfn_t pfn;
+ hpa_t hpa;
- if (sp->role.direct && *sptep == shadow_notrap_nonpresent_pte) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "audit: (%s) error: notrap spte in direct sp: %p\n",
- audit_msg, sp);
+ sp = page_header(__pa(sptep));
+
+ if (sp->unsync) {
+ if (level != PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "audit: (%s) error: unsync sp: %p level = %d\n",
+ audit_msg, sp, level);
return;
}
- if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) ||
- !is_last_spte(*sptep, level))
+ if (*sptep == shadow_notrap_nonpresent_pte) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "audit: (%s) error: notrap spte in unsync sp: %p\n",
+ audit_msg, sp);
return;
+ }
+ }
- gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, sptep - sp->spt);
- pfn = gfn_to_pfn_atomic(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
+ if (sp->role.direct && *sptep == shadow_notrap_nonpresent_pte) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "audit: (%s) error: notrap spte in direct sp: %p\n",
+ audit_msg, sp);
+ return;
+ }
- if (is_error_pfn(pfn)) {
- kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
- return;
- }
+ if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) || !is_last_spte(*sptep, level))
+ return;
- hpa = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+ gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, sptep - sp->spt);
+ pfn = gfn_to_pfn_atomic(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
- if ((*sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK) != hpa)
- printk(KERN_ERR "xx audit error: (%s) levels %d"
- " gva %lx pfn %llx hpa %llx ent %llxn",
- audit_msg, vcpu->arch.mmu.root_level,
- va, pfn, hpa, *sptep);
+ if (is_error_pfn(pfn)) {
+ kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
+ return;
}
-}
-static void audit_mappings(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
- unsigned i;
-
- if (vcpu->arch.mmu.root_level == 4)
- audit_mappings_page(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmu.root_hpa, 0, 4);
- else
- for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
- if (vcpu->arch.mmu.pae_root[i] & PT_PRESENT_MASK)
- audit_mappings_page(vcpu,
- vcpu->arch.mmu.pae_root[i],
- i << 30,
- 2);
+ hpa = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ if ((*sptep & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK) != hpa)
+ printk(KERN_ERR "xx audit error: (%s) levels %d"
+ "pfn %llx hpa %llx ent %llxn",
+ audit_msg, vcpu->arch.mmu.root_level,
+ pfn, hpa, *sptep);
}
-void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
+static void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
{
unsigned long *rmapp;
struct kvm_mmu_page *rev_sp;
@@ -185,9 +164,10 @@ void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
}
}
-void audit_sptes_have_rmaps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void audit_sptes_have_rmaps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
{
- mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, inspect_spte_has_rmap);
+ if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep) && is_last_spte(*sptep, level))
+ inspect_spte_has_rmap(vcpu->kvm, sptep);
}
static void check_mappings_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
@@ -239,13 +219,23 @@ static void audit_all_active_sps(struct kvm *kvm)
walk_all_active_sps(kvm, audit_sp);
}
+static void audit_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, int level)
+{
+ audit_sptes_have_rmaps(vcpu, sptep, level);
+ audit_mappings(vcpu, sptep, level);
+}
+
+
+static void audit_vcpu_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ mmu_spte_walk(vcpu, audit_spte);
+}
+
static void kvm_mmu_audit(void *ignore, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const char *msg)
{
audit_msg = msg;
audit_all_active_sps(vcpu->kvm);
- if (strcmp("pre pte write", audit_msg) != 0)
- audit_mappings(vcpu);
- audit_sptes_have_rmaps(vcpu);
+ audit_vcpu_spte(vcpu);
}
static void mmu_debug_enable(void)
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-28 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-28 11:58 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: MMU: mmu audit code improved Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-28 12:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: MMU: support disable/enable mmu audit dynamicly Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-29 9:16 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-30 1:58 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-28 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: MMU: improve active sp audit Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-28 12:02 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-08-28 12:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: MMU: lower the aduit frequency Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-29 9:19 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-30 2:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-30 6:59 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-30 10:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: MMU: support disable/enable mmu audit dynamicly Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-30 10:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: MMU: move audit to a separate file Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-30 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: MMU: improve active sp audit Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-30 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: MMU: improve spte audit Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-30 10:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: MMU: lower the aduit frequency Xiao Guangrong
2010-08-30 15:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-08-31 2:27 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-09-01 9:06 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-01 16:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-09-02 8:30 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C78FAC8.6050806@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.