All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: walt <w41ter@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu?
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:02:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7A7697.3060407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <i56o0g$b27$1@dough.gmane.org>

  On 08/27/2010 12:57 AM, walt wrote:
>
>> Also try qemu-kvm with -no-kvm-irqchip. I can't believe an in-kernel 
>> lapic would make this much of a difference with windows 7 but it's 
>> worth trying.
>
> Using that flag wipes out the difference entirely:  both come in at 
> about 65 seconds.
>
> I also tried xp-32 running on the same two kvm64 virtual machines, 
> with slightly
> different results:
>
> qemu-kvm:  35 seconds (65 seconds using -no-kvm-irqchip, a huge 
> disadvantage)
> qemu:      58 seconds
>
> Anything unexpected in these results?

Looks like kernel irqchip is the cause for the difference, which isn't 
too surprising.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

      reply	other threads:[~2010-08-29 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-25 19:37 [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm faster that qemu? walt
2010-08-25 19:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-25 23:09   ` [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm faster than qemu? walt
2010-08-25 23:28     ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-26  7:53       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-08-26  7:59         ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-26  9:59           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2010-08-26 10:24             ` Alexander Graf
2010-08-26 10:25               ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-26 11:56                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-08-26 12:54           ` Anthony Liguori
2010-08-26 12:57             ` Gleb Natapov
2010-08-26 21:57       ` walt
2010-08-29 15:02         ` Avi Kivity [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C7A7697.3060407@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=w41ter@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.