From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [RFC] training mpath to discern between SCSI errors Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:10:22 +0200 Message-ID: <4C7BADBE.1090202@suse.de> References: <20100825155918.GB8509@redhat.com> <4C7B984E.4070802@suse.de> <4C7B9F14.9080900@mvista.com> <4C7BA670.2060303@suse.de> <1283172674.23482.3.camel@localhost> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1283172674.23482.3.camel@localhost> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com, device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids Christophe Varoqui wrote: >> So we would be ending with: >> >> ENOLINK: transport failure >> EIO: retryable remote failure >> EREMOTEIO: non-retryable remote failure >> > would scsi reservation conflict errors raise EREMOTEIO in this case ? > = Precisely. Cheers, Hannes -- = Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg)