All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] display_buffer: fix misaligned buffer
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:03:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7BF271.1050808@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2sk1whwte.fsf@ohwell.denx.de>

Le 30/08/2010 18:47, Detlev Zundel a ?crit :
> Hi Reinhard,
>
>> Detlev Zundel schrieb:
>>
>>>> Detlev, regarding the discussion I would only point out that we have to
>>>> be sure that such kind of patch will be merged in the current release.
>>>> It would be a real pity if a new official realease is published and then
>>>> even a simple "md" command does not work on ARM.
>>>
>>> I don't see a problem here.  All proposed patches (with/without
>>> attribute and union) surely fix a bug, so they will go into mainline
>>> when consent is reached on which one to use.  This should well happen
>>> before the pending release on September 12th[1].
>>>
>>> Am I misunderstanding anything here?
>>
>> No... but I would require that the "union" approach would be wanted,
>> BEFORE I put effort into doing it.
>
> I'd very much appreciate your effort as I want the solution now that you
> did whet my appetite.

Besides, re: 'fixing with the side-effect of a different thing': I think 
the alignment caused by using an union is not actually a side effect of 
it but an intended effect of it, as the compiler must ensure correct 
alignment of each union member -- on architectures where alignment of 
32-bit ints is unnecessary, the union will not cause undue alignment, 
whereas the __aligned__ attribute would.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-30 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-27 20:23 [U-Boot] [PATCH] display_buffer: fix misaligned buffer Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-30  8:59 ` Detlev Zundel
2010-08-30  9:22   ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-30  9:39     ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-30 10:02       ` Detlev Zundel
2010-08-30 10:31         ` Stefano Babic
2010-08-30 10:46           ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-08-30 11:04             ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-30 11:05           ` Detlev Zundel
2010-08-30 13:37             ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-30 16:47               ` Detlev Zundel
2010-08-30 18:03                 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2010-08-30 18:25                   ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-30 22:32                     ` Detlev Zundel
2010-08-30 22:29                   ` Detlev Zundel
2010-08-31  5:38                     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-08-31  6:04                       ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-09-01 15:01                         ` Detlev Zundel
2010-09-02  7:39                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-09-02 17:42                         ` Mike Frysinger
2010-09-07 23:23       ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-08-30  9:49     ` Detlev Zundel
2010-09-07 23:22     ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C7BF271.1050808@free.fr \
    --to=albert.aribaud@free.fr \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.