All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] UML development, anyone?
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:17:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7C2DE4.3090203@iki.fi> (raw)

Hello all,

I'm a long-time UML user and lately I've become a bit worried on the 
state of the UML. This list, as well as the -user one, is very quiet 
these days. Is there someone still actively developing the UML? I have 
to say I really like it! Running Linux on Linux reliably and 
efficiently, just what I need! :-)

I'm currently running three UML virtual machines on an server using 
Athlon XP-M. The host is running 2.6.31 and the guests are 2.6.27.

I cannot upgrade neither host nor guests due to these problems:

- SKAS 3 patches available up to 2.6.31 only. Merging this to current 
kernel might not be a problem, just some work, but:

- Severe data corruption on guest on recent guest kernel versions. I'm 
using a few hard disk partitions directly for UML guests. Something 
after 2.6.27 guest breaks this quite badly. Even for small data sets 
like 100 MiB, copying a file to a different location on guest and then 
running md5sum on both often produces a different result.

Do I have any options than to switch to Qemu and suffer the performance 
penalty from emulation (kqemu is obsolete, too) or to switch to newer 
hardware that supports kvm? Qemu performance is somewhat less than 10 % 
of the native (or UML) performance.

I also found something called lguest but haven't given it a try yet. 
Looks the most interesting but that doesn't seem to have much list 
activity either. So it works perfectly for almost everyone or has few 
users... ;)

How are others coping in the current situation? Or is it just me who has 
these troubles...?

Best regards,

-- 
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@iki.fi

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel


             reply	other threads:[~2010-08-30 22:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-30 22:17 Sakari Ailus [this message]
2010-09-01 11:20 ` [uml-devel] UML development, anyone? Boaz Harrosh
2010-09-12  7:34   ` Sakari Ailus
2010-09-12  9:48     ` Boaz Harrosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C7C2DE4.3090203@iki.fi \
    --to=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.