From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4C80B0A9.20502@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:24:09 +0200 From: Till Kamppeter MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C809328.300@ac-orleans-tours.fr> <4C80AB6B.10202@gmail.com> <4C80AE55.2040608@ac-orleans-tours.fr> In-Reply-To: <4C80AE55.2040608@ac-orleans-tours.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] New PDF file format in CUPS List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stephane Ascoet Cc: printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org On 09/03/2010 10:14 AM, Stephane Ascoet wrote: > Till Kamppeter a écrit : > >> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/openprinting/pdfasstandardprintjobformat > > Yes, I read this things... Thanks for the answer, but even if the > application send the job in PDF, there's still a conversion from PDF to > PS, which consumes CPU energy, reducing the advantage of using a PS > printer. The PDF->PS conversion as a vector-to-vector conversion should be much less CPU-consuming than a vector-to-raster conversion as you would have with a non-PostScript printer. Till