From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:27:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:59814 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1491085Ab0ICL1h (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:27:37 +0200 Received: from corscience.de (DSL01.212.114.252.242.ip-pool.NEFkom.net [212.114.252.242]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MUAOE-1PIOyq2F98-00R2oP; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:27:26 +0200 Received: from [192.168.102.58] (unknown [192.168.102.58]) by corscience.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FC751FA1; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:27:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C80DB9C.8060403@corscience.de> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:27:24 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: N32: Fix getdents64 syscall for n32 References: <1283501734-6532-1-git-send-email-walle@corscience.de> <20100903084213.GA32339@lst.de> <4C80BC3A.7010406@corscience.de> <20100903100140.GA29187@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20100903100140.GA29187@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:qPuc5Y8f3gR++0NuCwaWEf9AH4CK/3cwO8raOiGzX3K k10jLq63x4j6y+0vcH88RbKLi7vkJjD/BxBuOQC5fzZdhEBw4n sShmSpCv88N1Tuq6vXgiNks6ej3bMcYTWSAt/my8kgjuTxL6no AKUmctS6a5pbPpUepEgISBwW3dCoi5WdWaC0C0nyvxCo2MhFz4 xnUBLPUBrAUdD9bf3guBg== X-archive-position: 27717 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: walle@corscience.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2666 Am 03.09.2010 12:01, schrieb Ralf Baechle: > > I'm certainly not interested on getting cc'ed half of I2C patches or > Itanium framebuffer drivers. The defaults are idiotic. Anybody who > touched a file in the past year will get spammed. > > Throw in a --nogit to disable the history search and you get: Ok, I will use that in the future. But what about the patch itself? Regards, Bernhard