From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kiyoshi Ueda Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: make sure FSEQ_DATA request has the same rq_disk as the original Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:51:43 +0900 Message-ID: <4C80E14F.9040307@ct.jp.nec.com> References: <1283162296-13650-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1283162296-13650-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20100830132836.GB5283@redhat.com> <4C7BB932.1070405@kernel.org> <4C7BD202.4040700@kernel.org> <4C7DFD8F.6070200@ct.jp.nec.com> <4C7FE251.2020003@kernel.org> <4C808BF8.7060402@ct.jp.nec.com> <4C80C0D6.4030405@kernel.org> <4C80CDC6.8060100@ct.jp.nec.com> <4C80DF15.20100@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C80DF15.20100@kernel.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Mike Snitzer , jaxboe@fusionio.com, j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, jamie@shareable.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de List-Id: linux-raid.ids Hi Tejun, On 09/03/2010 08:42 PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On 09/03/2010 12:28 PM, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote: >> Thank you for pointing it. >> Yes, the interface should also set rq->q. >> >> About the naming of the interface, blk_set_ sounds >> reasonable to me. >> But does blk_set_rq_q() take request and queue as arguments? >> Then, I'm afraid we can't find bdev for bio from given queue. > > Oh, right. Maybe blk_set_rq_bdev() then? Yeah, although struct request doesn't have the member 'bdev', blk_set_rq_bdev() may be better from the view of the arguments. Thanks, Kiyoshi Ueda