From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010... Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:26:26 +0400 Message-ID: <4C850822.1080403@vlnb.net> References: <4C76CA57.3050405@vlnb.net> <1282857806.32007.175.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <4C79484B.3090607@vlnb.net> <1283028468.32007.357.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <4C7C18CE.5020103@vlnb.net> <1283204792.32007.448.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <4C7FFD1A.8090509@vlnb.net> <1283459158.5598.143.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <20100905201802.GC18411@core.coreip.homeip.net> <1283723447.556.133.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <20100905234134.GA17212@core.coreip.homeip.net> <1283731194.556.147.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <1283769578.15944.1293.camel@mulgrave.site> <1283772443.15944.1320.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:60932 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750885Ab0IFP04 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:26:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1283772443.15944.1320.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Bart Van Assche , Mike Christie , Dmitry Torokhov , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Chetan Loke , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, FUJITA Tomonori , scst-devel James Bottomley, on 09/06/2010 03:27 PM wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 13:02 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM, James Bottomley >> wrote: >>> >>> [ ... ] >>> >>>> So, please understand that code and project workflow is only one of the >>>> reasons why TCM/LIO v4 was selected over SCST. >>> >>> It isn't yet ... your code still has to be reviewed properly. My >>> preferred reviewer is currently honing his skills on a diet of raw beef >>> in Argentina, but hopefully he'll get around to it shortly. >> >> The SCST developers and the SCST users will definitely appreciate it >> if review efforts will be spread evenly over both projects. > > SCST isn't at the starting gate yet, so there's nothing currently to > review. Hmm, there are patches for review for several months (http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/13/146). Nothing major changed since that time. But we are going to send patches for the latest code this week anyway. Vlad