From: Darren Salt <linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Permissions in udev don't work when klibc is used ?
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:01:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C855FEA33%linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200402231118.26239.remco@d-compu.dyndns.org>
I demand that Kay Sievers may or may not have written...
[snip: user/group names, klibc]
> I want to keep the difference between glibc and klibc as small as possible.
> It's easy to do with just a few lines and it's better than a magic update
> script and a udev.permissions without user readable content.
This seems reasonable...
> And initrd just needs a copy of the system files.
And when they're updated (assuming that the change, be it in a udev
configuration file or /etc/passwd or /etc/group or similar) affects
ownership)? Automatically rebuild the image, rerun lilo? :-)
Not that it really matters: ISTM that an early udev could populate the
initial /dev (almost) entirely from sysfs, using default settings of
root:root 0600. Once into early userspace, a "full" udev would be run, with
one of the effects being to set access rights to something more appropriate.
(I don't use an initrd for non-rescue non-install boots, and plan to (try to)
continue this even if/when It Is Decreed That Thou Shalt Use An Initrd, It Is
No Longer Optional. I just don't *want* an initrd...)
--
| Darren Salt | d youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | nr. Ashington,
| Debian, | s zap,tartarus,org | Northumberland
| RISC OS | @ | Toon Army
| <URL:http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/progs.packages.html>
tartar sauce: n. # rm -rf /usr/{local/,}src/*
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1356&alloc_id438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-23 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-23 10:18 Permissions in udev don't work when klibc is used ? Remco
2004-02-23 10:47 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-23 14:01 ` Remco
2004-02-23 14:30 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-23 15:18 ` Remco
2004-02-23 16:39 ` Olaf Hering
2004-02-23 18:31 ` Kay Sievers
2004-02-23 18:55 ` Olaf Hering
2004-02-23 19:01 ` Darren Salt [this message]
2004-02-23 19:10 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C855FEA33%linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk \
--to=linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.